Members login Not a member yet? Sign up
Matthew Moses

Hollywood just doesn't get comic books.

Published on 22/5/07 in Movies
There is more to comics than gaudy costumes and superpowers.

Now I will be honest; the majority of movies based on comic books are sub-par, do not follow the source material really well, and are too dumbed down for audiences due to a need to be overly generalized. Movie studios are too scared to invest time, effort, and heart into projects which could truly play out as our own modern mythology. People look at comic books and sneer as if this a juvenile form of entertainment without any literary value or merit. These tales are far more than simple entertainment. They are tales of action, adventure, and when written with respect for both the character and the content, capable of deep, emotionally rich stories. They can be progressive, such as X-Men, which symbolized racism and its harmful effects on society, and Daredevil, a comic which presented the ability of the blind to function in and contribute to society. They can be introspective, such as the brooding Batman or the alcoholic Tony Stark of Iron Man. They can be about the nobility of the human spirit, such as Superman or 300. And they can be about the darker side of man (Sin City, V for Vengeance).

Comic books are morality plays, insight into modern culture, views into human nature, and larger than life epics that help to make it all palatable because it attempts to prove to us the nobility of man. Like the tales of Greek gods and heroes, Celtic myth such as Beowulf, and the olden tales of Arthur and his knights, comics are our modern day legends.

The problem with the current studio system is that it does not recognize these tales for the rich characters and tales they have to tell. These are merely stories with explosions, excessive violence, over the top villains, and quirky jokes. The studios have glossed over the material and understood only the outlying plot but not the theme to what makes comic books such an endurable part of American, as well as world, entertainment.

One fine example is what became of the Spider-Man franchise. Whereas the first two movies did well in capturing the heart of the Spider-Man series, Peter Parker struggling to do what was right in a world that didn't always appreciate his efforts as he attempts to discover his place in it, the third movie simply crapped on story for more violence and mindless plot that served on to cram as many characters as possible into an already overburdened cast. Juvenile humor was used to deal with serious plot threads, such as how power can ultimately corrupt an individual (Parker with the symbiote which would eventually become Venom). Rather than show the inner turmoil of a character whose actions never seem capable of ever totally solving all of his problems (the more he helps the city the more he drives MJ away, whereas the more attention he spends on MJ and his own life the more the city suffers), they make it seem as if Peter's life is simple as can be. Having a full-time job in a precarious position as a photographer, attending college, trying to carry on a relationship, and being the sole champion of a city shouldn't come easily to anyone. Spider-Man 2 did well in showing how difficult it is to carry on so many responsibilities and the sacrifices that generally accompany having to make such choices of public service: when do the good of the many outweigh the good of the few. Spider-Man 3 completely crapped all over that dilemma by removing it and making being a superhero seem so easy. To put oneself consistently in harm's way, to sacrifice oneself for so many: to make it seem so easy is to completely undermine the heroic nature of being a superhero. Spider-Man 3 could have been about how the stress of doing so much finally led Peter into a gray zone where he began to take shortcuts (becoming violent, taking advantage of his powers to improve his own life versus those of others, etc.). Instead it became another mindless popcorn flick as Sony freaked over its declining profits and wanted to ensure its economic security.

Comic books are about the possibilities that lie within all of us. There is a reason the early heroes costumes were under there clothes, why these heroes were separate identities from who they really were. A hero can be anyone, anywhere, at any time. That possibility lies within all of us. It is not who we are but we we do, our actions, that define us as heroes. The real us is not important. It is the ideal, the hero that we seek to become, that is the truly super part about being a superhero. Likewise, the infamy that all of us are capable of, how readily we may slip into the abyss beneath that thin line we walk everyday are ready fodder for comic book tales.

Comic books are rich material. They are more than a child's early steps into novels. They are visual tales that captivate and illuminate the world around us. They are living, breathing art. They are us magnified. If only studios could realize this and put that heart into their translations to the big screen one could just imagine the amazing tale they could tell.

Tag & Vote

Technorati Technorati Tags:
comic, books, superman, spiderman, batman, ironman, 300, sin, city, movies, studios, sony, venom, x-men, daredevil, gods, beowulf
Social Bookmark:
Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit
Vote:
 4.7 (3 votes) Login to vote

Share, it's good for you


Copy and paste the code above to post this story on your MySpace or Blog.

9 Comments

Wanna comment? Signup!

Wow, that was actually constructive and well-written. Don't get me wrong, I always enjoy reading this site, but that was well done. How about more of it? Written on 23/5/07
Thanks for the compliment. As to more articles, trust me, I'm always writing something. Hoping to craft a few toons in the next couple weeks. Trust me, my madness in visual form is far more entertaining. Written on 23/5/07
I agree. Comic Books are waaay underrated. Written on 23/5/07
Really great article mate. A friend of mine went to watch Ghost Rider recently, and confirmed my greatest fears. They actually managed to fuck up a story which I thought to be un-fuck-uppable. I've stopped wishing they'd make a film version of my favorite comic books, and actually hope they don't. I don't want my mind poisoned by the filth the spend countless millions to produce.Hollywood will never learn and will undoubtedly continue to screw up great opportunities for comic book stories in the realm of cinema. This trend will continue until there's nothing left. I do however think that Sin City and 300 were great representations of their comic book origins. But what about the rest? The Hulk - piece of shit; The Fantastic Four - piece of shit; Spiderman 3 - gigantic piece of shit etc. etc..
It's a damn shame. Written on 24/5/07
However, we must give hollywood some credit. They've become a lot better since the 70's Written on 24/5/07
Hollywood is too determined to make money rather than to give us what we, the fans, truly want: living art. So the industry generalizes material in order to draw in the most people. God forbid they remain true to the material or hire actors who fit the roles. Instead they dumb down the story, cast whoever is the biggest name at the time, and completely rape the senses in order to make a quick buck. The problem Hollywood hasn't noticed is that in order to make a quick buck they are undermining their long term financial goals. If they are putting out shit now then why would anyone even think to pay $10 for a ticket to the garbage coming out later? Hollywood is only screwing up their future bottom line because no one believes their product is worth anything anymore, which it pretty much isn't. Luckily there is still room for art, especially in the comic book genre. I've heard very positive info around the Dark Knight and Iron Man films being filmed. As to the debacle that was Spider-Man 3, that can only be blamed on the suits becoming way too involved in the franchise. You'd think that if a director could write two films in a franchise that each made over $350 million then they would buy themselves a bit more independence. Instead, Sony choked the life out of it by seizing control of the series away from Raimi. It's no wonder Sam has gone on record as saying he pretty much doesn't want to film any more Spidey flicks. This after the success of Spider-Man 2 when he stated that he could see the series go to six/seven movies. Great Sony, you ran off the heart of the franchise. I guarantee you the fourth Spidey film, and there will be a fourth one, will be what Superman IV was: using property name and prior franchise hits alone to draw in an audience while suffering from poor direction, acting, and writing. Hollywood, clean up your act. There is a reason this material is so prized and iconic. Put faith in the material, give the helm to directors who actually understand the characters (Ghostrider a blatant step in the wrong direction. That director already screwed up Daredevil so you give him another character to butcher.), and stand back with a hands off approach. You'd be surprised at the money you'll make a la Batman (1989), Superman (1978), X-Men 2 (2002), and Spider-Man (2002). Otherwise all you'll get is crap that kills franchises: Daredevil (2002), Hulk (2003), and Batman and Robin (1997). If you believe the bottom line is the most important then learn to be an investor and stop micromanaging. There is a reason you guys are executives and not producers/directors! Written on 30/5/07
Thankfully it seems that some stories are too complex to adapt for (i.e. be fucked by) filming, vis. Sandman. And some get fucked and still survive - Alan Moore may have insisted his name be removed from any film of his books, but the second volume of The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen laid to rest the memory of that horrible, horrible movie. Written on 9/6/07
A studio exists to make money and profit. If they make a "great" movie with all the points made above and that movie tanks, they have failed.

The studio is a business, not an artist. Written on 21/6/07
Listen, I've read comic books for years, and hold a great fondness for numerous titles...but let's be realistic: even the greats, such as Kirby, never held their product in as high a renown as their fans. The problem with fanboys, in the case of comics, is that the 'bang,' 'k'pow!' schlock that populated comics in earlier times actually represents the true spirit of the genre. Exempting johnny-come-latelies such as Gaiman and Moore, who have every right to complain about what's done cinematically with their work, there's too much revisionism going on with comic fans today. These movies harken back to the early days of the characters, where stories were often clunky, enemies both ridiculous and scene-stealing, and dialogue often stilted and campy. You've come to embrace the characters as they've evolved (often via torturous ret-conning, I might add) from their original creators; but perusal of the origins of Spider-Man and his ilk dredges up foolish, splashy encounters with Paste Pot Pete (WTF!?) and other nonsense, peppered liberally with 'What If?' stories that couldn't be more forgettable.

Also, not all comic movies are tripe...'Sin City' was basically a frame-by-frame recreation of the comic. This tired meme you're expounding on hasn't been tempered by the moderate success of recent big screen adaptations, and would rather live on the fumes of the better-aborted Captain America and never-released FF movies. Grow up. Written on 29/6/07

Wanna comment? Signup!